Reflective Paper

LO 19 November 2012 Prior to writing the summary/ chemical reception on Confronting Inequality by Paul Krugman, I utilise several(predicate) techniques to help me stay put hold prepared to write. Not consciousness what the bind was about, I re discover it five divers(prenominal) time to be able to register it in my judicial decision and come to better(p) understanding. For each paragraph of the article, I took down notes and refer points that do it much easier for me when I started writing. Before the final lottery was written, I only had one compose. Reason being that I read the article so many measure, my first draft was a reflection of that. The differences between the two drafts were very chela changes same(p) proper diction and learning not to include in the flesh(predicate) opinion in a summary. Another difference was that unlike the first draft, in the final draft I prohibit all my formatting errors. Writing this summary/ receipt give in m ade me realize that in order to write an useful paper, especially on such complex issue as inequality, one has to reread and dissect the article various times before completely understanding what is being state.

Utilizing the skill verbalise above, I believe I did fulfill the assignment that was assigned. I successfully summarized the authors argument in the article and responded to it with my opinion and helped take it up with textual evidence. The major revision I would pauperisation to make for my portfolio, if any, would be to lengthen the paper with more of my response to the whole article of Confrontin g Inequality. I think I would take up to m! ake these revisions because on a paper like this transaction with part of an individual opinion, more would like to be seen in order to gain insight on whether I wordless the article and my point of view on the subject.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper